Epiphanies LLP
The Home of Profitable Thinking
  • Home
  • Services
  • Clients
  • People
  • Blog
  • News
Businessman working on laptop in office, being concerned
September 6 2018

Thinking in business

epiphanieswp Engagement, Performance

I know what it’s like. I’ve been there. 18 hour days cycling in all weather conditions high up in the remote Rockies, miles from civilisation, on my own, sleep deprived, hungry and physically tired. The effect was to reduce the quality of my decisions to worse than those of a drunk. I should not be surprised, research into the impact of the training regime on Navy Seals and Army Rangers has documented in some detail just how badly degraded cognitive functioning can become in extreme environments. It explains in part my utterly stupid decision to see whether I could get a photograph of the black bear I had missed by inches whilst descending a steep mountain path. Common sense would have dictated putting some distance between myself and the startled animal, rather than stopping and get my camera out. Clearly, I was not thinking straight.

An army of intelligence

Try as I might, I cannot find the same research into the impact of extreme environments on the lives of business people. A business person may not be expected to spend time in the wilds, but extremely long working hours, lots of travel across time zones, different cultures and languages and the pressure to deliver results is by no means easy when compared to someone who attends the same office each day, parking in the same place and with a mostly similar routine.

Take for example the case of John, normally an engaging and interesting person, he sat at the dinner table contributing little to the conversation. He had landed at the airport just a few hours earlier from a transcontinental flight, one of several he’d taken that week as he travelled around the world visiting suppliers and shareholders. He wasn’t too sure whether the meal he was eating was meant to be breakfast, lunch or dinner, so confused was his body clock. In the past, John had been a keen rugby player and occasional cyclist, but he was simply too tired to do any activity these days. There are many senior business leaders who would relate to John’s current state. If this work environment is having the same cognitive degrading impact on John as the military environment does on soldiers, then John’s decisions are likely to be significantly poorer than if he were fresh and rested.

At present, there is no easy way of assessing the impact to determine a) whether John should be making an important decision, given his state or b) at what point he is sufficiently recovered to be considered “effective”. If John were drunk at work, he would be dismissed, or at the very least sent for some counselling to help him learn how to manage his alcohol intake. So why is it that, when the context in which John has to operate potentially reduces his decisions to worse than that of a drunk, we simply expect him to get on with it? It makes no sense to me.

The military have some tried and tested methods to train people such that in the heat of the moment and under extreme pressure, even when tired they are more likely to take the right decisions. We have no such training in business.

Just like many executives, John had learned to cope. He had adapted to his lifestyle and had developed a level of resilience to the pressure. These adaptations are to be expected based on the research into military training. This same research also shows us that coping can vary depending on a number of additional factors, such as:

  1. The nature of the extreme environment – for example, the sense of isolation
  2. The characteristics of the person – for example, their will to win
  3. The work that has to be done – for example how ambiguous or monotonous the work is
  4. The level of danger – the personal risk to the individual

In business, the decisions are unlikely to be life threatening either to self or others, but they are many and varied and relentless in nature. The world of work in business has its equivalent aspects of a) to d) above, but in the absence of research, it is not clear how these pressures compare to those of the military.

A safer way

My plea is that we take a systems approach to the way we manage our best people. Instead of simply looking at their performance in isolation, we should factor in all the significant elements that can impact on performance such as travel, the business trading environment, the nature of the work the individual is being asked to do, the people they are working with and through, and to look at it as a whole.

Secondly, we stop deluding ourselves that a busy executive jetting around the world is a valuable and useful person and discourage people from seeing that lifestyle as a badge of honour. If we really want the best decisions from our best people, we should focus on ensuring that they are cognitively effective: This means properly rested, living a healthy lifestyle and having the time and space to think. The paradox is, the more senior an individual is in a business, the more they are paid to think and the less to do, and yet these are the people most under pressure to be here, there and everywhere, which degrades the very thing we are asking them to do.

Thirdly, is that we treat the nature of work in the same way that Health and Safety has separated out process safety from ‘personal safety’. Yes, we need to help people to manage their resilience and stress (the equivalent of personal safety) but we should also consider more carefully the impact of the environment in which people are expected to operate (the equivalent of process safety). Above all, it’s an area that cries out for more research.

Dominic Irvine ©2018 All rights asserted

First published in bdaily on 5 September 2018

 

 

Dreaming Resilience An eye on fatigue at work

Related Posts

Habits

Engagement, Performance, Resilience, Team

Tips for Working at Home

Resilience (1)

Performance, Resilience

The business of surviving the coronavirus

Video conference

Engagement, Management, Performance, Team

Virtual Working

Search

Categories

  • Clients past (5)
  • Engagement (24)
  • Innovation (20)
  • Leadership (9)
  • Management (16)
  • Networking (5)
  • News (30)
  • Performance (54)
  • Resilience (9)
  • Sports (19)
  • Tandem record (2)
  • Team (20)
  • Uncategorized (1)

Archives

  • October 2020 (1)
  • April 2020 (2)
  • March 2020 (8)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • October 2019 (1)
  • August 2019 (1)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • June 2019 (2)
  • May 2019 (2)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • February 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (2)
  • December 2018 (3)
  • November 2018 (4)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • August 2018 (1)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • March 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (5)
  • October 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (2)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • January 2017 (1)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (2)
  • April 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • May 2015 (4)
  • April 2015 (3)
  • March 2015 (6)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (8)
  • December 2014 (5)
  • November 2014 (3)
  • October 2014 (6)
  • September 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (4)
  • July 2014 (8)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • March 2014 (2)
  • February 2014 (1)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (1)
  • August 2013 (4)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (1)
  • February 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (2)
  • October 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (2)
Epiphanies LLP
© Epiphanies LLP 2023
Powered by Themify WordPress Themes