Epiphanies LLP
The Home of Profitable Thinking
  • Home
  • Services
  • Clients
  • People
  • Blog
  • News
continuous improvement
November 28 2019

All this talk of change is annoying me

epiphanieswp Management, Performance

In 1963, Porsche launched the 911 at the Frankfurt motor show. The 2.0 litre engine produced 130 BHP. The latest version produces 380 BHP. What I think is more impressive is the humble Ford Fiesta. The little 1.0 engine in its highest specification produces a staggering 197 BHP. That’s 50% more power than the original Porsche in an engine half the size. What was once great in 1963 is mediocre by today’s standards. 

Don’t think such improvement is limited to manufacturing. Take something as simple as running and the same improvement in performance can be seen. In 1908 the winning time for the marathon in the London Olympics was 2:55:18. Just over a hundred years later, the winning time at the London Olympics was 2:08:01, a 27% improvement in performance. But by today’s standards, even this time is mediocre with Elid Kipchoge’s remarkable marathon time of 1:59:40. What is more remarkable is that in the London marathon of 2012, 786 runners went faster than the winning time in the 1908 Olympics. What was once considered an elite performance is now the standard of a good club runner. Everywhere you look what was once great is by today’s standards mediocre. The supermarket revolution started by Clarence Saunders in 1916 with his Piggly Wiggly brand was a radical innovation, but today’s shoppers would be frustrated by having to wait for a checkout person to process their goods when compared to the convenience of self scan that we have today. And sure enough, whatever we define as today’s great will be tomorrow’s mediocre. 

Change is like breathing – it happens all the time. If we stop breathing, we die. If we cease changing we don’t stand still, we go backwards, we get left behind. I think one of the problems with large scale change projects is that we call them change projects. It has people thinking that this change is somehow unusual or unique rather than business as usual. It leads some people to argue that we should keep things as they were and that all this change is somehow bad. This is predicated on a nonsense that there was such a time when things were stable and did not change. This is to take a very narrow slice of time and define it as ‘always’ a notion that stands little scrutiny. Take any current product or service and track it back and you will find a series of changes.

Given all this, why do so many people argue that people do not like change? Quite patently they do, otherwise there would be no market for the latest version of anything. Neither would people participate in the great life changing events such as marriage or having children. The issue is not the change, but the ambiguity and the fear of not being in control or the lack of clarity about the consequences of the change. It makes good sense to be cautious about what you don’t understand or perceive as threatening. I was once cycling off-road through a high mountain pass in the United States  when I saw in front of me what looked like a snake, but equally could just be a stick. Had I rushed over to explore and it was indeed a snake I could easily have been bitten and possibly died. By being cautious and approaching more carefully I was able to assess the threat whilst minimising the risk. In just the same way, when faced with change, about which there is uncertainty, people understandably proceed with caution. We need to stop confusing caution with a dislike of change and see it for what it is, a sensible approach in the absence of sufficient information. One solution is to help make the change accessible by making it more familiar. Familiarity is highly correlated with liking. Classic examples include calling the first motor cars “horseless carriages” or cash machines “Autotellers”. These labels helped people understand the new technology and so help make it more accessible.

Most change does not appear out of thin air. It is not quite the surprise we think. The precedents already exist. Everything about the iPhone existed before the iPhone was launched. Touch screens, Mp3 players, cameras, personal digital assistants, cellular technology. What Steve Jobs did was to pull all this together into one device. My request is that we stop talking about ‘change’. We just don’t need the term. Call things what they are, the latest version, a revised system or an improved process. We need to help people see that to use the term change is akin to checking in with everyone at the start of the meeting to see if they are breathing – it’s silly.

Dominic Irvine © 2019 All rights asserted

First published in BDaily Newson 28 November 2019

No light at the end of the tunnel The way we do things around here

Related Posts

Coffee chat

Leadership, Management, Resilience

Leading the way through this crisis

Habits

Engagement, Performance, Resilience, Team

Tips for Working at Home

Resilience (1)

Performance, Resilience

The business of surviving the coronavirus

Search

Categories

  • Clients past (5)
  • Engagement (24)
  • Innovation (20)
  • Leadership (9)
  • Management (16)
  • Networking (5)
  • News (30)
  • Performance (54)
  • Resilience (9)
  • Sports (19)
  • Tandem record (2)
  • Team (20)
  • Uncategorized (1)

Archives

  • October 2020 (1)
  • April 2020 (2)
  • March 2020 (8)
  • December 2019 (1)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • October 2019 (1)
  • August 2019 (1)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • June 2019 (2)
  • May 2019 (2)
  • April 2019 (1)
  • February 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (2)
  • December 2018 (3)
  • November 2018 (4)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • August 2018 (1)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • March 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (5)
  • October 2017 (1)
  • June 2017 (2)
  • May 2017 (2)
  • April 2017 (1)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • January 2017 (1)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (2)
  • April 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (1)
  • December 2015 (2)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (1)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • May 2015 (4)
  • April 2015 (3)
  • March 2015 (6)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (8)
  • December 2014 (5)
  • November 2014 (3)
  • October 2014 (6)
  • September 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (4)
  • July 2014 (8)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • March 2014 (2)
  • February 2014 (1)
  • January 2014 (2)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • November 2013 (1)
  • August 2013 (4)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (1)
  • March 2013 (1)
  • February 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (2)
  • October 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (2)
Epiphanies LLP
© Epiphanies LLP 2023
Powered by Themify WordPress Themes